Shenandoah Valley Network shenandoahvalleynetwork.org
« Home Who We Are What We Do I-81 Updates How You Can Help Contact Us
County by County
News and Resources

Augusta
Clarke
Frederick
Highland
Page
Rockingham
Shenandoah
Warren

Reasonable Solutions for I-81:
A Six-Point Plan for the Future

Adopted by (as of August, 2006):

Augusta, Rockingham, Shenandoah, Clarke and Albemarle Counties; City of Roanoke; Towns of Front Royal, Tom’s Brook, New Market, Edinburg, Mt. Jackson; Shenandoah Valley Travel Association, Virginia Hospitality & Travel Association; Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, Civil War Preservation Trust, National Trust for Historic Preservation, National Parks Conservation Association; Rail Solution; Shenandoah Valley Network (Augusta Community Partnership, Rockingham CAP, Shenandoah Forum, Scenic 340 Project), Valley Conservation Council; Edinburg Chamber of Commerce; Appalachian Trail Conservancy, Shenandoah Resource Conservation & Development Council, Virginia Conservation Network, Virginia League of Conservation Voters; Pure Water Forum; Potomac Conservancy; Friends of the North Fork of the Shenandoah River; Shenandoah Preservation League.


WHEREAS, there is a need to address safety issues and congestion problems on portions of I-81 throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia; and

WHEREAS, an eight to 12 lane, tolled truck lane project has been proposed and is under review by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT); and

WHEREAS, elected officials both state and local, business groups and citizens organizations throughout the I-81 corridor have called for an alternative plan that is less costly, more targeted to specific safety and congesting issues, and more effective at moving goods and people throughout the corridor;

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the undersigned hereby supports Reasonable Solutions for I-81: A Six Point Plan for the Future, as outlined below. We call on federal, state and local governments to work cooperatively toward achieving these goals:

1) Complete spot improvements to I-81, such as climbing lanes and redesigned exits, which will improve safety and relieve congestion. Data should support the need and type of each improvement, many of which are identified in earlier VDOT studies.

2) Use the highway's median for improvements to limit the encroachment of the road on private property and to avoid further impacts on adjacent landowners, communities, farmland, battlefields and tourism.

3) Significantly step up law enforcement to improve safety.

4) Incorporate meaningful transit options for both urban and rural areas in road improvement plans. Coordinate with cities, local governments, major employers and universities.

5) Implement the rail component of a balanced transportation system to increase options for freight capacity, maintain economic competitiveness and avoid air quality and congestion problems as road use grows.

6) Provide funding for land acquisition to mitigate impacts of I-81 on cultural resources in the corridor, most notably battlefields.

.Let your local and state officials know that you believe there are reasonable solutions to I-81