Efforts to secure
up to $800 million in federal highway funds to build a $13 billion
toll truckway on I-81 throughout Virginia failed to find support
in the final transportation bill adopted Friday by Congress. A consortium
of road builders known as STAR Solutions, along with House Transportation
Committee Chair Don Young (R-Alaska) and perhaps Virginia Governor
Mark Warner were the unlikely allies lobbying Congress this year
to earmark the truckway funds. Reports indicated the Governor Warner
supported the truck lanes on the Hill but his office did not respond
to questions from reporters.
Instead, the final highway
bill limited I-81 funding to $141.5 million, with $100 million earmarked
for “dedicated truck lanes for additional capacity”
and the remainder slated “to manage freight movement and safety
improvements to I-81.”
“Common sense
prevailed in Congress,” said Laura Olsen, of the Coalition
for Smarter Growth, which has worked closely with citizen’s
groups in the Shenandoah Valley on the truckway issue. “Congress
didn’t hand STAR Solutions a big chunk of Virginia’s
money to build a massive toll truckway that a state study said would
fail to address safety or congestion issues, cost too much and create
too many environmental problems.”
Opposition to the toll
truckway was widespread in the Shenandoah Valley and further south
along the I-81 corridor. Every Shenandoah Valley state legislator
supported a bill in the 2005 General Assembly session ordering VDOT
to halt negotiations with STAR. More than 40 local governments passed
resolutions against the truckway and encouraging the state to pursue
alternatives, including increased rail freight. In June, the Shenandoah
Valley Network joined the Virginia Trucking Association and Virginia
Manufactuers Association in a letter urging the Congressional conference
committee working on a final highway bill not to fund the toll truckway.
New Truck Lane Program Dies in Conference Committee
The STAR truckway in Virginia was to serve as a showcase for Congressman
Young’s idea of a national dedicated truck lane program, but
the program did not survive in the final highway bill. The highway
bill also banned the use of non-compete clauses for toll projects
that involve federal funds which STAR needed to justify the project
to financial bond agencies. The non-compete clause would have prevented
VDOT from making improvements to any transportation facility (road,
transit or freight rail) that might draw traffic from I-81.
Limited Earmarks for I-81
Out of $22 billion in specific spending earmarks in the federal
bill, just $141.5 million was targeted to Interstate 81. Congressman
Young included the $100 million earmark for “construction
of dedicated truck lanes for additional capacity on I-81 in VA,”
but it lacks the strings that were attached in his original truck
lane program. In the final bill, neither tolls nor expensive separated
lanes are required. It is possible that targeted improvements such
as “dedicated” truck climbing lanes would qualify for
the $100 million.
Senator Warner secured
$41.5 million to "manage freight movement and safety improvements
to I-81." But he made the funding flexible, likely in response
to input from Virginia constituents and growing evidence that the
STAR Solutions mega project will not survive.
“In providing
flexible funding for anything from spot improvements to rail freight,
Senator Warner showed his fiscal leadership and concern for opposition
in the I-81 corridor,” said Kim Sandum of the Community Alliance
for Preservation, a member of the Shenandoah Valley Network.
Federal Agency Unhappy with Truck Lane Proposal
The failure to secure significant federal funding is just the latest
blow to the STAR toll truckway project. In March, VDOT’s draft
preliminary Environmental Impact Statement was released to federal
and state agencies involved or affected by the project. The STAR
plan (called “Truck Lanes” in the report) received the
worst results – in terms of cost and effectiveness –
of all of the options examined for I-81. VDOT is currently adding
various new scenarios to the study, which is due out in the fall.
Officials at the Federal
Highway Administration have indicated that due to the massive project's
failure to adequately address safety and congestion issues, cost
and environmental impacts, it is very unlikely that the project
could ever receive necessary federal approvals. This assessment
is based on the very poor performance of the STAR truckway in VDOT's
preliminary draft environmental impact statement.
General Assembly Delegation to Meet
The entire I-81 Virginia legislative caucus will meet in August
to formulate a list of criteria and project ideas they want VDOT
to incorporate into the ongoing study of how to address truck traffic,
safety and community needs in the corridor. It is widely expected
that the delegation will endorse a package of options that focus
on targeted, realistic, affordable and community-friendly means
to improve I-81 for commercial drivers, as well as local residents
and tourists.
“The STAR truckway
proposal seems nearly dead,” Gallagher said. “We hope
VDOT is listening and moves towards a much smaller scale approach
to addressing needs in the I-81 corridor. VDOT should study targeted
improvements for safety and congestion, expanding enforcement, meaningful
transit options such as carpool hotlines, park and ride lots, and
targeted bus service, and freight rail improvements to remove trucks
from the road.”
More
information on other earmarks for the Shenandoah Valley and
I-81 corridor.
For more information
on the Federal Transportation Bill and VDOT funding earmarked for
other projects in Virginia see Coalition
for Smarter Growth's site.
The full text
of the bill is available at http://www.house.gov/rules/109textTEALU.htm
and will soon be posted in the online Congressional Record.
See http://Thomas.loc.gov
#####
See Before
& After Photos
of I-81 truck lanes
Contact
Senator Warner and Thank Him!
More on the
I-81 project
Click
Here for PDF version of a fact sheet that you can print
Additional Fact Sheet - VDOT Study Shows
Trucks Lanes Most Expensive & Least Effective |